Publications

Traction force microscopy (TFM) quantifies cellular forces at the cell-extracellular matrix interface, yet elastic formulations neglect viscous dissipation and can misinterpret cellular forces on viscoelastic substrates. We introduce a semi-analytical 2D viscoelastic TFM (veTFM) that generalizes the Boussinesq framework of elastic TFM to Generalized Maxwell (GMX) substrates with one or two components. By combining Fourier and Laplace transforms, veTFM quantifies time-resolved tractions in finite-thickness substrates and resolves stress-free reference and substrate pre-stress. We derive criteria for when elastic regimes remain valid in this framework. This positions veTFM as a scalable extension of standard 2D TFM (eTFM) to viscoelastic substrates, identifying when eTFM remains sufficient, which elastic limit applies, and when full viscoelastic quantification is required. Applied to beating cardiomyocytes, epithelial cells, and dermal fibroblasts cultured on linear-polyacrylamide and alginate viscoelastic hydrogels, veTFM shows that the elastic or viscoelastic regime engaged by the cell depends on timescale matching between the loading rate and the substrate's relaxation times. Notably, for the Generalized Maxwell substrates analyzed here, viscoelastic traction magnitudes scale with the substrate's total dissipation rather than individual relaxation times, with total dissipation setting traction magnitude and timescale matching determining whether the cell engages the substrate in an elastic or viscoelastic regime.

JTD Keywords: Biomaterials, Cell, Cell-material interactions, Extracellular-matrix viscoelasticity, Focal adhesions, Guide, Hydrogels, Numerical inversion, Semi-analytical methods, Stress relaxation, Viscoelastic hydrogels, Viscoelastic traction force microscopy

Recently, organoids have emerged as revolutionizing tools with the unprecedented potential to recreate organ-specific microanatomy in vitro. Upon their derivation from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), organoids reveal the blueprints of human organogenesis, further allowing the faithful recapitulation of their physiology. Nevertheless, along with the evolution of this field, advanced research exposed the organoids' shortcomings, particularly regarding poor reproducibility rates and overall immatureness. To resolve these challenges, many studies have started to underscore the relevance of mechanical cues as a relevant source to induce and externally control hPSCs differentiation. Indeed, established organoid generation protocols from hPSCs have mainly relyed on the biochemical induction of fundamental signalling pathways present during kidney formation in mammals, whereas mechanical cues have largely been unexplored. This review aims to discuss the pertinence of (bio) physical cues within hPSCs-derived organoid cultures, while deciphering their effect on morphogenesis. Moreover, we will explore state-of-the-art mechanobiology techniques as revolutionizing means for understanding the underlying role of mechanical forces in biological processes in organoid model systems.

JTD Keywords: development, hpscs, mechanobiology, nephrogenesis, Activated ion-channel, Development, Extracellular-matrix viscoelasticity, Forces, Hpscs, Ips cells, Mechanical regulation, Mechanobiology, Nephrogenesis, Nephron progenitors, Organoids, Pluripotent stem-cells, Self-renewal, Substrate mechanics, Tissue