Publications

Objectives: Despite the high survival rates of dental implants, peri-implantitis is a prevalent complication. Periimplantitis is related to biofilm that adheres to the surface of implants and causes peri-implant chronic inflammation and bone destruction. Different surface treatments have been proposed to prevent biofilm formation. The objective of this systematic review was analyzing different types of antimicrobial coatings and identifying the most effective one(s) to control bacterial colonization over extended periods of analysis. Data, sources and study selection: We performed a bibliographic search in Pubmed and Cochrane base of articles published after 2010 to answer, according to the PICO system, the following question: What is the most effective antibacterial surface coating for dental implants? Only papers including a minimum follow-up bacteria growth analysis for at least 48 h were selected. After selection, the studies were classified using the PRISMA system. A total of 40 studies were included. Conclusions: Three main categories of coatings were identified: Antibacterial peptides, synthetic antimicrobial molecules (polymers, antibiotics, ...), and metallic nanoparticles (silver). Antibacterial peptide coatings to modify dental implant surfaces have been the most studied and effective surface modification to control bacterial colonization over extended periods of incubation as they are highly potent, durable and biocompatible. However, more in vitro and pre-clinical studies are needed to assess their true potential as a technology for preventing periimplant infections.

JTD Keywords: Anti-infective coating, Antibiotics, Antimicrobial peptide coatings, Antimicrobial peptides, Antimicrobial polymers, Bacterial colonizatio, Biofilm formatio, Cationic peptides, Chimeric peptides, Dental implants, Human gingival fibroblasts, Metal nanoparticles, Osseointegrated oral implants, Peri-implantitis, Silver nanoparticles, Surface treatment, Sustained-release device, Titanium surfaces

ObjectivesThis study evaluated different designs of the conical implant-abutment connection (IAC) and their resistance to microgap formation under oblique loads as specified by the ISO standard for testing dental implants. Also evaluated was the effect of deviations from the ISO specifications on the outcomes.MethodsFinite element analysis was conducted to compare the microgap formation and stress distribution among three conical IAC designs (A, B, and C) in two loading configurations: one compliant with ISO 14801 and one with a modified load adaptor (non-ISO). The different IAC designs varied in the taper, diameter, and cone height. The cone angle mismatch (Cam) between the implant and abutment was considered. A torque of 20 Ncm and oblique loads (up to 400 N) were simulated.ResultsThe stresses produced by the screw-tightening torque varied among the different IAC designs. The contact height was approximately 0.3 mm for Designs A and B, and less than 0.03 mm for Design C. Under oblique loads, Design A maintained IAC sealing without gap formation up to 400 N. With the ISO adaptor, gaps appeared in Design B at 300 N and in Design C at 90 N. The non-ISO adaptor resulted in gap formation at 160 N for Design B and at 50 N for Design C.ConclusionsThe IAC design and cone angle mismatch significantly influenced microgap formation, with some designs showing zero gaps even when the oblique load reached 400 N. The non-ISO adaptor increased gap formation in IACs B and C.

JTD Keywords: Bacterial leakage, Behavior, Dental implant, Dental implant-abutments design, Dimensional measurement accuracy, Finite element analysis, In-vitro, Interface, Mechanical, Peri-implantitis, Scre, Sealant agents, Stres, Taper

Dental implant-associated infection is a clinical challenge which poses a significant healthcare and socio-economic burden. To overcome this issue, developing antimicrobial surfaces, including antimicrobial peptide coatings, has gained great attention. Different physical and chemical routes have been used to obtain these biofunctional coatings, which in turn might have a direct influence on their bioactivity and functionality. In this study, we present a silane-based, fast, and efficient chemoselective conjugation of antimicrobial peptides (Cys-GL13K) to coat titanium implant surfaces. Comprehensive surface analysis was performed to confirm the surface functionalization of as-prepared and mechanically challenged coatings. The antibacterial potency of the evaluated surfaces was confirmed against both Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus mutans, the primary colonizers and pathogens of dental surfaces, as demonstrated by reduced bacteria viability. Additionally, human dental pulp stem cells demonstrated long-term viability when cultured on Cys-GL13K-grafted titanium surfaces. Cell functionality and antimicrobial capability against multi-species need to be studied further; however, our results confirmed that the proposed chemistry for chemoselective peptide anchoring is a valid alternative to traditional site-unspecific anchoring methods and offers opportunities to modify varying biomaterial surfaces to form potent bioactive coatings with multiple functionalities to prevent infection.

JTD Keywords: biocompatibility, cytotoxicity, delivery, dental implants, prevention, release, stability, surface coating, titanium, zirconia, Antimicrobial peptide, Biocompatibility, Dental implants, Peri-implantitis, Surface coating, Titanium