by Keyword: Supervised learning
Han, J, Jeong, HJ, Choi, J, Kim, H, Kwon, T, Myung, K, Park, K, Park, JI, Sanchez, S, Jung, DB, Yu, CS, Song, IH, Shim, JH, Myung, SJ, Kang, HW, Park, TE, (2025). Bioprinted Patient-Derived Organoid Arrays Capture Intrinsic and Extrinsic Tumor Features for Advanced Personalized Medicine Advanced Science , 2407871
Heterogeneity and the absence of a tumor microenvironment (TME) in traditional patient-derived organoid (PDO) cultures limit their effectiveness for clinical use. Here, Embedded Bioprinting-enabled Arrayed PDOs (Eba-PDOs) featuring uniformly arrayed colorectal cancer (CRC) PDOs within a recreated TME is presented. This model faithfully reproduces critical TME attributes, including elevated matrix stiffness (approximate to 7.5 kPa) and hypoxic conditions found in CRC. Transcriptomic and immunofluorescence microscopy analysis reveal that Eba-PDOs more accurately represent actual tissues compared to traditional PDOs. Furthermore, Eba-PDO effectively capture the variability of CEACAM5 expression-a critical CRC marker-across different patients, correlating with patient classification and differential responses to 5-fluorouracil treatment. This method achieves an uniform size and shape within PDOs from the same patient while preserving distinct morphological features among those from different individuals. These features of Eba-PDO enable the efficient development of a label-free, morphology-based predictive model using supervised learning, enhancing its suitability for clinical applications. Thus, this approach to PDO bioprinting is a promising tool for generating personalized tumor models and advancing precision medicine.
JTD Keywords: Association, Cancer, Carcinoembryonic antigen-expression, Colorectal cancer, Cultur, Differential expression, Embedded bioprinting, Extracellular-matrix, Inter-patient variability, Patient-derived tumor organoid, Stem-cell, Stiffness, Supervised learning, Tissues, Tumor matrix stiffnes
Santos-Pata, D, Amil, AF, Raikov, IG, Rennó-Costa, C, Mura, A, Soltesz, I, Verschure, PFMJ, (2021). Epistemic Autonomy: Self-supervised Learning in the Mammalian Hippocampus Trends In Cognitive Sciences 25, 582-595
Biological cognition is based on the ability to autonomously acquire knowledge, or epistemic autonomy. Such self-supervision is largely absent in artificial neural networks (ANN) because they depend on externally set learning criteria. Yet training ANN using error backpropagation has created the current revolution in artificial intelligence, raising the question of whether the epistemic autonomy displayed in biological cognition can be achieved with error backpropagation-based learning. We present evidence suggesting that the entorhinal–hippocampal complex combines epistemic autonomy with error backpropagation. Specifically, we propose that the hippocampus minimizes the error between its input and output signals through a modulatory counter-current inhibitory network. We further discuss the computational emulation of this principle and analyze it in the context of autonomous cognitive systems. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
JTD Keywords: computational model, dentate gyrus, error backpropagation, granule cells, grid cells, hippocampus, inhibition, input, neural-networks, neurons, transformation, Artificial intelligence, Artificial neural network, Back propagation, Backpropagation, Brain, Cognitive systems, Counter current, Error back-propagation, Error backpropagation, Errors, Expressing interneurons, Hippocampal complex, Hippocampus, Human experiment, Input and outputs, Learning, Mammal, Mammalian hippocampus, Mammals, Neural networks, Nonhuman, Review, Self-supervised learning
Herreros, I., (2018). Learning and control
Living machines: A handbook of research in biomimetics and biohybrid systems (ed. Prescott, T. J., Lepora, Nathan, Verschure, P.), Oxford Scholarship (Oxford, UK) , 239-255
This chapter discusses basic concepts from control theory and machine learning to facilitate a formal understanding of animal learning and motor control. It first distinguishes between feedback and feed-forward control strategies, and later introduces the classification of machine learning applications into supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning problems. Next, it links these concepts with their counterparts in the domain of the psychology of animal learning, highlighting the analogies between supervised learning and classical conditioning, reinforcement learning and operant conditioning, and between unsupervised and perceptual learning. Additionally, it interprets innate and acquired actions from the standpoint of feedback vs anticipatory and adaptive control. Finally, it argues how this framework of translating knowledge between formal and biological disciplines can serve us to not only structure and advance our understanding of brain function but also enrich engineering solutions at the level of robot learning and control with insights coming from biology.
JTD Keywords: Feedback control, Feed-forward control, Supervised learning, Unsupervised learning, Reinforcement, Learning, Classical conditioning, Operant conditioning, Reflex, Anticipatory reflex