Publications

Objectives: Despite the high survival rates of dental implants, peri-implantitis is a prevalent complication. Periimplantitis is related to biofilm that adheres to the surface of implants and causes peri-implant chronic inflammation and bone destruction. Different surface treatments have been proposed to prevent biofilm formation. The objective of this systematic review was analyzing different types of antimicrobial coatings and identifying the most effective one(s) to control bacterial colonization over extended periods of analysis. Data, sources and study selection: We performed a bibliographic search in Pubmed and Cochrane base of articles published after 2010 to answer, according to the PICO system, the following question: What is the most effective antibacterial surface coating for dental implants? Only papers including a minimum follow-up bacteria growth analysis for at least 48 h were selected. After selection, the studies were classified using the PRISMA system. A total of 40 studies were included. Conclusions: Three main categories of coatings were identified: Antibacterial peptides, synthetic antimicrobial molecules (polymers, antibiotics, ...), and metallic nanoparticles (silver). Antibacterial peptide coatings to modify dental implant surfaces have been the most studied and effective surface modification to control bacterial colonization over extended periods of incubation as they are highly potent, durable and biocompatible. However, more in vitro and pre-clinical studies are needed to assess their true potential as a technology for preventing periimplant infections.

JTD Keywords: Anti-infective coating, Antibiotics, Antimicrobial peptide coatings, Antimicrobial peptides, Antimicrobial polymers, Bacterial colonizatio, Biofilm formatio, Cationic peptides, Chimeric peptides, Dental implants, Human gingival fibroblasts, Metal nanoparticles, Osseointegrated oral implants, Peri-implantitis, Silver nanoparticles, Surface treatment, Sustained-release device, Titanium surfaces

Liquid crystals (LCs) possess unique physicochemical properties, translatable into a wide range of applications. To date, lipidic lyotropic LCs (LLCs) have been extensively explored in drug delivery and imaging owing to the capability to encapsulate and release payloads with different characteristics. The current landscape of lipidic LLCs in biomedical applications is provided in this review. Initially, the main properties, types, methods of fabrication and applications of LCs are showcased. Then, a comprehensive discussion of the main biomedical applications of lipidic LLCs accordingly to the application (drug and biomacromolecule delivery, tissue engi-neering and molecular imaging) and route of administration is examined. Further discussion of the main limi-tations and perspectives of lipidic LLCs in biomedical applications are also provided.Statement of significance: Liquid crystals (LCs) are those systems between a solid and liquid state that possess unique morphological and physicochemical properties, translatable into a wide range of biomedical applications. A short description of the properties of LCs, their types and manufacturing procedures is given to serve as a background to the topic. Then, the latest and most innovative research in the field of biomedicine is examined, specifically the areas of drug and biomacromolecule delivery, tissue engineering and molecular imaging. Finally, prospects of LCs in biomedicine are discussed to show future trends and perspectives that might be utilized. This article is an ampliation, improvement and actualization of our previous short forum article "Bringing lipidic lyotropic liquid crystal technology into biomedicine" published in TIPS.

JTD Keywords: drug delivery, glycerol monooleate, imaging, liquid crystals, Cancer, Drug delivery, Drug-delivery-systems, Glycerol monooleate, Imaging, In-situ, Liquid crystals, Nano-carriers, Nanoparticles, Phase-behavior, Stratum-corneum, Sustained-release, Tissue engineering, Vegetable-oil, Water